What is autism?
If someone is shy & considered “socially awkward” –
does that mean they have autism?
If someone is quiet & doesn’t speak much – do they have autism?
If someone is quiet & doesn’t speak much – do they have autism?
If someone is always tapping their finger or their head – is
that a sign of autism?
“SCIENTIFIC” STUDY
Well, according to a new study by the CDC, I had autism when
I was a kid which I have apparently grown out of. And 1 in 50 kids have it, at least, according Michael Rosanoff of advocacy
group “Autism Speaks”. 1 in 50??
Really?? Look, is it possible that of every 50 kids, at least one of them
is gonna have autism? Sure, I guess so. Anything’s possible. But how in the
world can doing a telephone survey on parents be considered a responsible way
of getting information that can dramatically impact families? That’s how this
particular study was done. 95,000 parents in 2011 and 2012 were contacted by
phone and asked certain questions about their children. According to the study,
less than a quarter of the parents contacted were interested in doing the
survey which says that parents not affected by autism were likely not the ones
answering the survey. But here’s my concern: parents cannot be the only source
of information gathering in regards to a child’s health.
TEAMWORK
Before you lose your mind, let me explain what I mean. I am
a fierce advocate for my children’s health. I stay on top of what needs to be
done and don’t necessarily agree with the doctor’s advice just because s/he is a doctor. We work as a team to do the best for my kids’ health issues. I do my research
and read up on issues related to their medical needs. But I am no doctor. I must
take into account what the medical professionals are telling me when making
final decisions on how to move forward. Isn't it possible that some parents who answered this survey have their facts wrong? Couldn't it be true that there are parents who believe their kids “have something”, even
though their doctors have disagreed with them, because they like to tap their
fingers on the floor while watching Sid the Science Kid or because they ignore their
name being called, no matter how much they’re
called? Then here comes this phone survey, asking questions about an
unsubstantiated fear they have and BOOM! 1 in 50 kids have autism!
Couldn't it also be true that these “symptoms” of mild
autism are just harmless habits? Maybe that socially awkward person IS just supremely
shy. Maybe that kid with a speech delay prefers to listen rather than speak. We
all know that there is no medical test, no genetic screening, which will
confirm conclusively that a person has autism. In very severe cases, it’s quite
obvious. But are we saying that every little quirk is something? Does everything a person do or think need to be diagnosed as some type of neurological deficiency or disability? I've told you before; I really hated science in middle school and didn't do so well in it. Should I have been diagnosed with a learning disability?
ENOUGH, ALREADY
Listen, I’m all for research but in my opinion, all this
media coverage on every single iota of autism research has gotten way out of
control. I receive several newsletters on disability issues daily and in every
piece of mail there are several links to one autism article or another. A new
study on rats; a new therapy that may cure it; smelling salts that will change
thinking patterns; scientific “breakthroughs” that have no evidence or track
record saturating the brains of families who are looking for cures or even just
minimal help.
Don’t you think that all this “information” is actually
detrimental, rather than helpful, to families who are really interested in
actual help?
I have to agree with you. Autism is the condition du jour. This is good as it is an epidemic and it is getting exposed. However, I think it is being over thought like a demon under every stone.
ReplyDeleteI was quite disappointed to see that Aspergers was now being included in the autism spectrum. When you expand the spectrum that much, two things happen:
ReplyDelete1) You start to make it the 'condition du jour' as Gail said ... *everyone* now qualifies under that spectrum.
2) You make it more difficult for those in need of services to actually get them. You cannot compare someone with mild Aspergers and someone with severe autism and say they have the same condition; nor that they'll respond to the same treatment.
Great! I was socially awkward a child, I was socially awkward as a teen, I am still socially awkward at 65....nothing a vodka and tonic can't cure. I have my share of diagnoses, don't need to be an aspie....I'll settle for settle socially awkward.
ReplyDelete